verbminx ([personal profile] verbminx) wrote2005-06-21 01:28 am
Entry tags:

aaand it continues!

Not sure how much I can say about this here publicly. But let's go.

I've mentioned lately that Tom and I are both having runs of almost comically bad luck. Bad timing, disappointment, misfortune, you name it. But none of it has been earthshattering, nobody has died or anything: it doesn't negatively impact the status quo or quality of life for either of us, it's only been disappointments related to our ambitions. I got sick and couldn't work, he didn't get a job he was up for, we have to postpone moving, etc. So... we're just shaking our heads and waiting for it to pass.

The latest thing came today. Tom was set to do a graphic novel for Oni, which was to be written by Andy Greenwald, who wrote a book on the emo scene called Nothing Feels Good and who has a novel coming out called Miss Misery. The proposal and the first 15 pages of script for The Satellite Heart have been kicking around the house for a while, and T. was waiting for more script so that he could get to work. Alas, Andy kind of overcommitted himself or something and is not going to be able to get the script done any time in the near future, so the project is shelved, probably permanently.

On the upside, Oni has another project they want to offer Tom; we'll see what happens with that.

I spent most of today with a terrible headache. We will blame PMS. Tylenol and tea helped. My mom bought me a copy of The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova, which came out last week. It's a first novel and Kostova got a huge advance, so it's already kind of infamous, but I read an excerpt I liked and a couple of great reviews. In tone the excerpt reminds me more of The Secret History and The Alienist than The DaVinci Code (crap! total crap!) - so I'm cautiously excited. They say this is "the book that will make Dracula scary again." Oh, and it's 40% off at Borders.

[identity profile] defensor.livejournal.com 2005-06-23 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
oh, and da vinci is crap. not as crappily crapific as some of its more active detractors make it out to be. but I think it suffers mainly from people overpraising it to begin with. I'll commend him on his research, but his style and plot choices are atrocious.

[identity profile] verbminx.livejournal.com 2005-06-23 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
The thing is, the research is mostly Holy Blood, Holy Grail - one book! Then some art history and a few other things, but I think I could have accomplished most of his research myself with about a month of full-time work. =/

It's mainly his style that bugs me. The man cannot write his way out of a paper bag, and still managed the BEST-SELLING NOVEL OF LIKE ALL TIME.

We hates the tricksy Dan Brown.
But we'll still be interested in Kryptos no matter whatses!

[identity profile] defensor.livejournal.com 2005-06-24 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, I read holy blood holy grail a long long time ago. I don't like it too much. it's interesting, but a very long stretch. you have to accept a lot of stuff on faith for the very foundations of their argument, and then they build wildly on it, so much so that to accept a conclusion way on down the line you have to remember it's built way back in the beginning on a speculation anyway. their book on the dead sea scrolls is very good tho. and also the messianic legacy. I found that quite compelling, except for the dumb shit at the end about the world needing a new king.